Q: The timeout in the third quarter ensured the possibility of
BB: In yesterday's game, we were at that point where we were in field goal range but it was a long field goal and it felt like if we changed ends of the field then that field goal range might not be there as evidenced by when we went for it on fourth down in the fourth quarter going into the wind in a similar field position situation. When the clock was running there, we wanted to try to give ourselves a chance. Of course in a close game like that, the game was tied at the time, you hate to waste timeouts because they can be valuable at the end, as we've seen many times this year, but I felt like it was worth it to be able to have a better opportunity on the kick. Not saying that Steve [Gostkowski] couldn't have made it going the other way, I just think it would have been a harder kick based on the conditions that were out there yesterday. Then we threw the incomplete pass and that might have helped us there, because had we completed the pass and not gotten the first down, then that would have been another situation and decision whether to use another timeout to preserve that but fortunately we didn't have to do that. If we had converted, then obviously we would have then gone into the fourth quarter but it would have been closer to the goal line, at least at the start, if we had picked up the first down and then been able to, even if we got stopped, it would have been a kick that I would have felt better about going that direction. It wasn't just the direction of the wind, there was also significant crosswind that all the specialists had to deal with. Yeah, of course, back to the first days I remember watching football, playing, watching, being a part of it, the wind conditions are always a factor in the kicking game first and then in the passing game. I'd say one of the biggest decisions and most critical decisions that I've ever been a part of on that was in the 1986 NFC Championship Game against the Redskins. It was a windy day in Giants Stadium. We've had many of those and we won the toss and Coach [Bill] Parcells elected to take the wind which wasn't very common. It wasn't a very common decision because, let's face it, you take it in the first quarter you're not going to have it in the second quarter. That was what he decided to do and we were able to really take advantage of that situation against the Redskins. We got three stops and 17 points and we had a 17-0 lead at the end of the first quarter in part due to the wind, good defense and good offense helped of course. But the field position was huge and that ended up being the final score of the game. That decision, the initial points and the way that the game started really was a huge part of what was reflected in a huge degree to that decision that Bill made. That was a good lesson for me to learn in my career. It was a great decision by Coach Parcells.
Q: Would you agree with the assessment that the blitz was a greater part of the defensive plan in this game than we've seen in the first seven games of the season?
BB: I think it kind of worked out that way yesterday. Part of it was, I think the conditions played a little bit of a part in that but also the game plan. It looked like Miami was having more success throwing the ball in the inside part of the field on shorter throws. When we were able to pressure with a middle of the field safety then more of those throws went to the perimeter, which were harder. Alfonzo [Dennard] and Logan [Ryan] and Devin [McCourty] and Kyle [Arrington] all made real good plays or were right there on the coverage on the sideline. It just seemed more evident as the game went on that when we pressured and gave that look that [Ryan] Tannehill was going to try to get the ball there as opposed to on the inside part of the field and it was just tougher to throw and our guys were doing a good job defending it. Logan broke up the route to [Charles] Clay there before the half going down the sideline and Kyle had one right in front of our bench and Logan had one to [Mike] Wallace there right in front of their bench and Alfonzo was right there on a couple back-shoulder throws. I think as we had some success with it and it became apparent kind of what they were going to do with it or it looked like what their plan on it was, we felt like that was a good option for us. A couple times we got pressure and he had to hold the ball for a second and we were able to hit him so that helped it out too.
Q: Mike Pouncey was subpoenaed yesterday at the stadium. Have you or any of your players been subpoenaed in relation to that case?
BB: I talked about that at the beginning of the season. It's an ongoing legal situation and I don't have any comment at all on it and can't make any.
Q: You can't say whether you or any of the players have been subpoenaed then?
BB: I just answered the question the best I can.
Q: How did you determine at halftime to stay the course and have faith in the plan you developed with things haven't gone well in the first 30 minutes?
BB: Well, because we just didn't really feel like there was a big need to. We didn't feel like what we were doing was, we weren't in a competitive situation or we didn't have a fair fight so to speak, we just felt like we needed to do it better. Sometimes you have a plan, you go in with a game plan and you see the matchups or you see their game plan and you recognize that this really isn't the best thing that we can be doing here so then you modify or change what you're doing to try to get your team a better opportunity to be productive and make plays. Then there are other times when you go in with a plan and you see what they're doing and you look at it and say, ‘Well, what can we do differently here?' And you kind of come back to saying, ‘Well, really what we're doing is probably the best thing we can do against this, we just have to do it better and we have to correct some of the things that we didn't do well and execute them better but we still have good running plays, we have good matchups in the passing game, we feel like we have the defenses that can handle what they're doing, we just have to play them better, just have to do them better. We've seen how they're attacking us.' Then our players had a chance to recognize that, I don't want to say adjust to it, but just execute it better when those situations came back up later in the game which they eventually did. I think that's a credit to the players that we didn't really make a lot of new defenses and new plays and new runs and all that. We just did the ones that we did a little bit better and that's, again, a credit to the players to make those on the field, in-game type adjustments and corrections.
Q: As a coach, how do you deal with things going up and down when things don't progress steadily like you want them to?
BB: I think that's the National Football League. That's the way it is in most every week in every game. Look, the Dolphins have a lot of great players, a lot of great coaches. They're very good at what they do, too. They have tough guys to match up on and it's very competitive, very challenge every single week, no matter who you play. Those guys are working just as hard as we are, have just as much talent, have the same opportunity and they do things that cause us problems, just like we've tried to do things that cause other people problems. There's certainly a punching, counter-punching type of thing. That's part of the play calling and decision making in the game. If you have something that's working, do you keep doing that knowing that eventually a good team on the other side of the field and good players are going to recognize it and put a stop to it? Or do you try to move away from it and anticipate that they're going to adjust what you're hurting them with? Then you move onto something else and you second guess yourself, ‘Am I moving away from success too quickly?' As any good fisherman knows, you never leave fish to find fish. But at some point in the football game against, like I said, good teams, good players, good coaches, they're just not going to let you keep doing the same thing forever. They're going to have an answer to it. When do you think they're going to have that answer and when do you move to something else? When do you stay with what's successful? Occasionally you get a few situations where it's easy and you can make that decision right away. You know you either need move on or maybe they just can't match up every once in awhile you get into one of those situations but for the most part, it's a little bit of a chess game. The shifting of matchups and shifting the strengths and weaknesses throughout the course of the game, you see it every week and I don't want to say every game, but most games you see it. There's an ebb and flow and that's part of it. Part of it is execution and motivation and just flat out playing. Sometimes though it's the matchups of plays and players that shift during the game and that affects it too. I don't know if that answers your question but that's always the dilemma is when do you move on from something that's going fairly well before you get it shut down?
Q: Do you look back and think you could have used
BB: I thought Stevan ran well. I thought all three of our backs were productive. I think when you look at the individual plays – I think they all did a good job – some of the plays that weren't good, I don't think it would have mattered who the back was. There wasn't really too much to be had on those plays. I think if you look at some of the better plays, probably no matter who was carrying the ball on those plays, they would have gained plenty of yards. I'm not saying it doesn't matter who the back is because they all broke tackles, they all had some good vision runs, had some good cuts and that kind of thing. Then there were a couple times when I don't know who could have made yards on some of those plays. We just didn't a couple times we had a bad play on, a couple times they did something or one of their players was either unblocked or we weren't able to really get them out of where we needed to get them out of and there was just nowhere to go. I think all three guys did a real solid job for us. They complemented each other and we have good depth at that position. It would be hard for me to really say one guy – when they had opportunities they did well with them. When they didn't, we tried not to go backwards and get what we could get and stay out of long-yardage situations, take care of the ball and live to play another down. I thought they all did a pretty good job of that.